(My opinion piece appeared in Ragan on September 24, 2009)
A big UUUM moment – looks like I’ve caused a furor over an opinion piece that appeared in Ragan.com today about the blurring lines of journalism. The central focus of my opinion piece was David Pogue, tech columnist for the New York Times, and some recent comments he made about him not being a journalist. Apparently, I took his statement out of context and applied it incorrectly.
Notwithstanding, I read Pogue’s posts religiously and I value his comments – as do thousand/millions of others. He knows what he’s talking about. That’s why he’s an expert and that’s why tech companies will continue to court him and fawn over him – as they do other influential columnists, technology-focused or otherwise.
Do I think any less of him? No.
Will I stop reading or respecting what he says? No.
Am I trying to make enemies? Absolultely not.
Can I voice my opinion? Yes.
Here’s a link to the entire post on Ragan.com, "Times' David Pogue blurs journalism lines"