In a desperate bid to dodge extradition to Sweden – where he’s wanted for questioning on a sex-crime
accusation and which would likely turn him over to the US government – Julian
Assange, WikiLeaks founder and document dumper extraordinaire has found political
asylum in Ecuador.
The WikiLeaks
founder, who has been ensconced in the Ecuadoran embassy in London since June
2012, got confirmation today that Rafael Correa, Ecuador’s president, has decided to shelter the
beleaguered Assange in his country, believing the latter’s human rights are
likely to be violated if English police arrest him.
I absolutely agree with the Miami Herald’s South American Bureau
Chief Jim Wyss, Ecuador is a bizarre
choice for Assange, (I’ve written about Wikileaks in my MediaPost column back
in 2010
and 2011) whose
website has leaked reams and reams of
classified government documents, videos and photos. Correa, on the other hand,
has a penchant for clampdowns on – and multimillion-dollar lawsuits against - the
country’s press.
But in the end it may not really matter,
not for Assange or WikiLeaks. At least it won’t matter when the organization is
now pulling sophomoric rubbish like faking
an article to make it look like a New
York Times columnist supports its iffy “mission.”
This summer seems to have been
one long string of assorted PR fiascos that, I admit, have been somewhat fun to
skewer on this blog. And yet, to the PR professional in me, these calamitous
blow-ups still have a nails-on-the-chalkboard effect. I have to cringe.
And cringe I did when I read
WikiLeaks’ smug tweeted admission of
responsibility for the fake op-ed piece, which has since been taken off the
Web, attributed to the New York Times’
Bill Keller. In the bogus column, Keller seems to say that WikiLeaks’
activities should be protected under the First Amendment. Once the article was
outed as fake, Keller took to his own Twitter feed to deny any
connection with it.
Whoever is tweeting for WikiLeaks
actually characterized the hoax as “successful.” Well, I guess if their
intention was to blow their own credibility out of the water, then yes, it was very successful indeed. Particularly for
an organization which purports to increase transparency and challenge our
world’s corrupt power arrangements by exposing their innards, credibility is
the very cement holding together the cinderblocks of its purpose.
Without it, the whole house falls
apart.
Uncovering the truth is supposed
to be WikiLeaks’ entire raison d’ etre.
So, when it brags about having fooled the NYT and everyone who pays attention
to these issues, it’s cutting off its own nose to spite its face.
After all, what did WikiLeaks really accomplish by pulling that stunt?
Did it help itself in any way? No, all it did was tell the world it can create
very convincing fake documents.
And that’s just going to make the
world think twice about the authenticity of its next document dump.